See whether a game fits your child — and how it asks for money.

Nothing here is a single opinion score. Each claim is graded on its own and the game takes the grade of its weakest critical claim.

Source class decides the ceiling

A rating board or a store listing on that body's own domain scores highest. A publisher statement on the publisher's own site counts as first-party. An editorial article scores lower. An AI summary is capped at 24 and can never carry a claim on its own.

Region, platform and edition are separate

The same game is often rated differently in different places. Each rating is stored with its own region and platform, and none of them overwrites another.

Conflicts are kept, not resolved

When two sources of the same scope disagree, both stay and the grade is capped at 39. You are shown the disagreement instead of a false single answer.

Evidence expires

Every claim carries a retrieval date and a review deadline: one year for age ratings, 60 days for purchase and spending claims. Past the deadline the grade is capped at 69 and the claim is flagged.

Missing evidence is never zero risk

A critical claim with no source scores zero and stays "unknown". A game is never called safe because nothing was found.

Cross-checking and human review raise the grade

A second independent source adds points. Without a named human reviewer no claim can reach A, however good the source is.